News, Comment, and Opinion

* * *
A thoughtful compilation and analysis of some important, but underreported and under-researched news stories, with particular focus on keeping the People informed about all Enemies, Foreign and Domestic.




  • The Roberts Hearings
  • Something's Fishy
  • I Ask of Public Officials Two Things Only: Leaders...
  • China and Russia kick off first joint military exe...
  • "Able Danger" -- DOD identified Mohammed Atta's Ce...
  • Would You be Shot and Killed as a Terrorist?
  • Was it Necessary for us to Drop the Atomic Bomb on...
  • More on the Deep, Dark Secrets of CAFTA
  • Man Who Commits Sexual Assault on Child Doesn't Ha...
  • The FairTax: A Rebuttal


  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • April 2005
  • May 2005
  • June 2005
  • July 2005
  • August 2005
  • September 2005
  • October 2005
  • November 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • October 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • February 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007

  • Subject Matter:
  • Alternative Energy
  • Asset Forfeiture
  • Astronomy
  • California
  • China
  • Congress
  • Connecticut
  • Constitution
  • Corruption
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Eminent Domain
  • Energy
  • Environmental Concerns
  • Europe
  • European Union
  • Florida
  • France
  • Germany
  • Georgia
  • History
  • Identity Theft
  • Illegal Immigration
  • International Law
  • International Relations
  • Islam
  • Israel
  • Japan
  • Law
  • Liberty
  • Massachusetts
  • Media Bias
  • Medicine
  • Mexico
  • Militant Islam
  • Militaristic Aggression
  • New Jersey
  • North Korea
  • Police State
  • Privacy
  • Rhode Island
  • Russia
  • Science
  • Second Amendment
  • Slavery
  • Social Security
  • Space Exploration
  • Supreme Court
  • Surveillance Society
  • Taiwan
  • Taxation
  • Technology
  • The ACLU
  • The FairTax
  • The FBI
  • The IRS
  • The President
  • Tyranny
  • United Kingdom
  • United Nations
  • Virginia
  • World Tax


  • Realm of Sovereigns
  • A Republic, if you can keep it
  • American Jury Institute/Fully Informed Jury Association
  • American Sons of Liberty
  • Amy Ridenour's National Center Blog
  • Anglerealm
  • Atlas Blogged
  • Badtux the Snarky Penguin
  • Big Brother Loves You -- Obey Big Brother
  • Black Box Voting
  • Castle Coalition
  • Conservative Punk
  • Constitutional Concepts Foundation
  • Constitution Death Pool
  • Copshots
  • Copwatch
  • David N. Mayer
  • Downsize D.C.
  • Future Musings and Desultory Glances
  • Gateway Pundit
  • GeoBandy
  • Gun Owners of America
  • Historium
  • historyteacher
  • How to Contact Congress or the White House
  • individ
  • Institute for Justice
  • Jack Yoest: War Archives
  • Jake Porter
  • Know Your Land Rights
  • Leaving Babylon
  • Libercontrarian
  • Libertarian Outlook
  • Liberty's Outpost
  • Libertythink
  • Live Free or Die
    -----The 'Civil Flag' -- Forgotten Flag, or Flag of Fraud and Fiction?
  • Mark Gilmore
  • Mike's America
  • Modern Tribalist
  • MoveOff
  • Mythusmage Opines (Old Link)
  • News, the Universe, and Everything
  • Obey
  • Oh, That Liberal Media!
  • Ordering a Pizza Under a National Computerized ID Database
  • Propaganda Matrix
  • ScrappleFace: News Fairly Unbalanced. We Report. You Decipher.
  • Steve's America
  • Tapscott's Copy Desk
  • Technorati (A useful blog search engine)
  • The Asylum
  • The City Troll
  • The FairTax
    -----Status of the 'Fair Tax Act of 2005' (H.R. 25; S 25)
  • The Fountain of Truth
  • The Free State Project
  • The Gun Toting Liberal
  • The Sentinel of Alachua County, Florida
  • Tomato 7
  • Tom’s Fireside Chat
  • TRIMonline
  • Truth in Justice
  • Victims-of-Law

  • Games:
  • Customary Checkers
  • The Basic Rules of Checkers (ACF Approved)
  • Abalone

  • Weights & Measures:
  • Nearly Everything You Need to Know About Weights and Measures
  • The Dozenal Society of Great Britain
  • Footrule

  • Miscellany:
  • Don McAlvany's International Collectors Associates (ICA)
  • The Relative Value of the Dollar (Use this CPI calculator to determine how the value of the current dollar stands up against past dollar values)
  • Writing Help (proofreading, copyediting, and research)
  • Common Errors in English
  • Useful Definitions of Political Terms

  • Charity:
  • AmeriCares
  • International Mission Board
  • Feed the Children
  • World Vision: Building a Better World for Children
  • - - -

    Powered by Blogger

    Anyone is free to comment on this site. Therefore, outgoing links posted by third parties may contain objectional material, but do not reflect the views of this site's owner. When linking to an outside page, links should not direct the reader to nude pictures, erotic stories, or other forms of pornography. Nor should links appear to sites using excessive profanity. Use common sense. If you would be ashamed for your church-going grandmother to see it, you shouldn't link to it. In addition to not linking to any inappropriate material, commenters should watch their language, else their posts will be deleted. Likewise, libelous statements will not be tolerated.

    [Most Recent Quotes from]

    [Most Recent Quotes from]

    [Most Recent USD from]

    Friday, September 30, 2005

    Illegal Immigration Still on the Rise

    "Illegal immigrants are increasing despite tighter border security and now outnumber foreigners moving to the United States legally."

    This does not make me happy. For those of you Libertarians who think illegal immigration is perfectly okay, you are not thinking clearly. United States territory is like our house. We get to say who comes into our house. It's basic property rights.

    I have never understood why President Bush wants to help illegal immigrants. His base supporters are largely against this. In fact, he would have lost the last election based on immigration (I suspect) if 9/11 hadn't happened and caused him to put a stop to his horse-trading with President Fox of Mexico.


    Blogger JoeSixPack said...

    I checked out the link you provided and it appears the author of the article places a lot of the blame for illegal immigration on our good economy. If he is correct in his assumption, the perceived problem of illegal immigration may self-correct as our economy succumbs to economic forces gathering just over the horizon. Keep a close eye on Fannie Mae for a hint of the next major financial tsunami following on the heels of Hurricane Katrina and Rita. Katrina and Rita are just warm ups to the Fannie Mae main show which will soon have its opening curtain.

    I’m not a Libertarian and therefore can’t speak for them, but I would disagree with your contention that, “United States territory is like our house…We get to say who comes into our house…It’s basic property rights.”

    If we take a look at the New London, Connecticut eminent domain case where private property owners were told they will have to vacate their property so a more thriving private enterprise (read: generating more tax revenue) will occupy their land, we’ve witnessed basic property rights, in the most classical and pure form, auctioned off. So, in that context and looking at the larger picture of United States territory we can extrapolate that we are going to have some difficulty making the leap from what was once considered an absolute principle (sanctity of private property) but is no longer, at least operationally speaking, to a concept implying sanctity of ‘public property’. Basically, ‘public property’ belongs to everyone, but no one person exclusively. Otherwise, we could all produce negotiable titles showing our ownership or interest in a given ‘public property’. Since we can’t do that, the basic issue of property rights becomes a moot issue. The poor subjects in New London, Connecticut at least had titles to the property being confiscated and we see what good that served them. So, if we compare the sad state of affairs leading up to what happened in New London, Connecticut we should not at all be surprised to see what is going on at the border.

    The Border Patrol has been on a hiring frenzy for quite sometime now. Initially the hiring was done to replace all those who bailed out to become Air Marshals. The more recent Border Patrol hiring has been expansionary in nature. And the problem of illegal immigration is becoming worse. This is characteristic of other governmental operations designed to prohibit a given activity. The ‘War on Drugs’, the ‘War on Terror’, the ‘War on Poverty’, and the ‘War on Illiteracy’, are all government sponsored programs that have failed miserably in accomplishing their intended purpose. For each new government sponsored disaster the answer or solution is always more money, more personnel, and more control. In the end the disasters just become bigger and more costly to deal with and government becomes larger and more intrusive. Generally speaking, whatever the Nanny State is working diligently to achieve it gets exactly the opposite outcome. Think about it for a minute…as tightly controlled as prisons are they still aren’t successful in keeping drugs out. In light of that, what hope does the Border Patrol have, even if they hired a million more agents, in preventing illegal immigration across that wide expanse of land separating us from our southern and northern neighbors, not to mention the West Coast, East Coast, and Gulf Coast portals?

    So, what is the answer to the immigration issue? Should we dismantle all border controls, abolish the Border Patrol, and throw out the welcome mat? Or should we continue peeking from behind a partially open door with our foot placed strategically at the bottom, as a door stop, in a vain, fruitless, and expensive attempt to keep the hordes of immigrants, illegal or otherwise, from stampeding on through it?

    My suggestion would simply be to end the perks associated with immigration, illegal or otherwise, into this country. That would eliminate most of the undesirable immigrants who are looking for a ‘free lunch’. The rest of those willing to pull their own weight are certainly welcome, in my opinion. After all, who isn’t an immigrant or a descendant of one?

    So, what is the real issue many have with immigration? Are they concerned their jobs will be stolen? Are they afraid they won’t be able to compete in the marketplace with a dirt poor immigrant who can’t read, write, or speak English? If they are afraid they can’t compete in the marketplace with a dirt poor immigrant who can’t read, write, or speak English…it doesn’t speak well of public education, does it?

    Maybe the reason Bush is going easy on the immigrant issue is because his plan to save Social Security is based on massive amounts of ‘new blood’ coming into the system. We’ve got an awful lot of baby boomers out there counting on Social Security to see them through their twilight years. If there isn’t a large influx of ‘new blood’ into the system the younger generation will assume a much larger portion of the Social Security burden than previous generations have had to contend with. If immigrants are willing to pull their weight and not become welfare recipients, I say bring ‘em on. And once the younger generation feels the burden of shouldering the full weight of the baby boomer Social Security entitlement they too will say, with one loud voice, “bring ‘em on”.

    9/30/2005 10:43 PM  

    Blogger The Sovereign Editor said...

    My problem with illegal immigrants is mainly that they don't speak English. And it's not even that that bothers me. . . it's the fact that my own government wants to bend over backwards to use my money to accommodate them in their language, thus taking away any incentive they might have to learn ours.

    With all due respect, your critique of the House doctrine does not exactly fit. In essence you are saying that how we divide the space in the house among the lawful residents is controlling over the way we decide who to admit into our house.

    Deciding how to use public property is difficult because, as you point out, we all have title, and none of us have title. However, when dealing with outsiders coming in, the issue is completely different. Public property is public United States property -- not public world property. In our system of government, if the People, or their lawfully elected representatives vote on how, when, and where foreigners may enter the country, then it is binding, because this is our house.

    10/01/2005 1:58 AM  

    Anonymous Scriptor said...

    Instead of continuing the bilingual system, we should spend the money telling the people what America is really like. I think it comes from rumors and fantasies of America being a "land of plenty and opportunity".
    I completely disagree with Spanish being an official language in some parts of this country. There is a reason that the Founding Fathers didn't make German an official language. It's because they realized not all of America had heavy German influences. So paying for translations and all that would be the equivelant of a giant pork project.

    10/02/2005 2:03 PM  

    Post a Comment

    Return Home

    * * *

    "If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."

    --Samuel Adams

    Sovereign Commentary · · Copyright © 2004-2007