A thoughtful compilation and analysis of some important, but underreported and under-researched news stories, with particular focus on keeping the People informed about all Enemies, Foreign and Domestic.
-----The 'Civil Flag' -- Forgotten Flag, or Flag of Fraud and Fiction?
-----Status of the 'Fair Tax Act of 2005' (H.R. 25; S 25)
Weights & Measures:
Anyone is free to comment on this site. Therefore, outgoing links posted by third parties may contain objectional material, but do not reflect the views of this site's owner. When linking to an outside page, links should not direct the reader to nude pictures, erotic stories, or other forms of pornography. Nor should links appear to sites using excessive profanity. Use common sense. If you would be ashamed for your church-going grandmother to see it, you shouldn't link to it. In addition to not linking to any inappropriate material, commenters should watch their language, else their posts will be deleted. Likewise, libelous statements will not be tolerated.
Saturday, July 02, 2005
More on Kelo v. New London -- it's been more than a week and this case still burns me up As you know, there is an effort underway to seize Souter's house and build a hotel there. The paperwork has been filed with his local zoning board. This man needs to be taught that it is wrong to use eminent domain to take someone's property and give it to another person, and I can think of no better way than to do it to him (remembering the principle that a leftist who's been mugged becomes a conservative or libertarian). Help see that "Justice Is Served" on Property Rights!
I all candor, I don't think this will happen -- ordinary eminent domain abuse is not targeted at specific people (at least, not officially). If Souter can show malice on the part of the developers, he can probably successfully challenge this sort of eminent domain seizure.
* * *
The ruling in Kelo v. New London goes against the Supreme Court's own precedents.
Apparently, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Bill of Rights cannot be altered, or the rights therein lessened, by wither the legislature or the courts.
"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts.
One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, free press, freedom of worship & assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."
Jackson, J., West Virginia State board of Education v Barnette 1943 319 US 624,638 87L ed 1628, 1638, 63 S Ct 1178, 147 ALR 674.
While I have not properly Shepardized this case, it has been cited by the Supreme Court as recently as 1997 and still appears to be good law.
Since Kelo nullifies part of the Fifth Amendment. It therefore goes against the ruling in West Virginia State board of Education and violates the principle of stare decisis (the principle by which prior decisions are controlling on future cases). Of course, I have never known the Supreme Court to shy away form overruling itself when convenient (it is rare for the court to ever admit that it is so doing, though).
Anyway, thought you might find that interesting.
* * *
Congress to Slap Down the Court's Eminent Domain Decision
The House on Thursday approved by a 231-189 vote a bid by conservative Scott Garrett, R-N.J., to bar federal transportation funds from being used to make improvements on lands seized via eminent domain for private development. Legislation in the works also would ban the use of federal funds for any project getting the go-ahead using the Kelo v. City of New London (Conn.) decision.
I approve. Very nice.
Meanwhile, in the Senate, we have John Cornyn's bill: S. 1313, would lay down a congressional definition of "public use," far narrower than the Court's constitutional interpretation in Kelo v. City of New London (04-108) . . . Here . . . is the operative part of the Cornyn bill:
"( a ) In General. -- The power of eminent domain shall be available only for public use.
"( b ) Public Use. -- In this Act, the term 'public use' shall not be construed to include economic development.
"( c ) Application. -- This Act shall apply to --
(1) all exercises of eminent domain power by the Federal Government, and
(2) all exercises of eminent domain power by State and local government through the use of Federal funds."
All freedom-loving people need to write their Congress-people and tell them that this, and legislation like it, is always a great idea.
* * *
Elsewhere on the Blogosphere and the Internet:
---------News Media Blackout On 'Revving Bulldozers,' Intimidation And Harassment Of New London Residents
---------Another Terrible Decision By 5 Robed Legislators
---------Location, Location, Location
---------Judicial Rulings Causing a furor in the Beltway...
---------Further Thoughts On The Kelo Ruling
---------Floodgates open following Kelo decision
---------Kelo and eminent domain abuse: What now? _____________________________________________
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."