Sandy Berger Participated in a National Security Panel Discussion at Purdue University

Story dated 25 February 2005

Okay. So what? Or, that's what I assume that average person would say in response to that. As for me, who pays attention to such things, I can't understand why Berger is not in prison, much less why he was speaking at Purdue University -- as if he were the sort of person with the character requirements to speak in such a forum. Or maybe character doesn't count for anything anymore. Berger was observed stuffing sensitive, highly classified documents into his socks and underwear. Such documents were recovered from Berger's office. What if you or I had done such a thing? Actually, I doubt you or I would hade made it out of the building without being arrested, nor would our protestations that we had 'accidentally stuffed the said documents into our socks and underwear' be accepted. Why is Berger afforded deferential treatment? Is he a member of a 'ruling class' to whom the ordinary rules do not apply? I certainly hope not.
---------Archives Staff Was Suspicious of Berger -- Why Documents Were Missing Is Disputed
---------Sandy Berger Probed Over Terror Memos
---------Feds probe Clinton aide over missing papers -- Former national security adviser under criminal investigation

posted by The Sovereign Editor | 10:06 AM

_____________________________________________